h1

So maybe I’m not delusional

August 13, 2011

It’s always amazed me that anyone tries to make a Constitutional argument for the individual mandate – the requirement to buy health insurance – portion of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. I’ve mentioned earlier that Radley Balko nailed that angle pretty well.

So it’s reassuring to hear a(nother) federal court agree that Congress doesn’t have the authority to pass such a law.

Appeals Court Strikes Down ObamaCare’s Individual Mandate, Calls It “a wholly novel and potentially unbounded assertion of congressional authority.”

Posted on August 12, 2011, 1:35PM | Peter Suderman

No, Congress can’t just decree that individuals must buy a private product, even if the market has unique properties. To do so would be more than unprecedented; it would be an unconstitutional overreach. That’s the gist of what an 11th Circuit appeals court said today when it ruled in favor of 26 state governments by saying that the federal requirement to purchase health insurance contained in last year’s health care overhaul is unconstitutional. From the ruling:

The individual mandate exceeds Congress’s enumerated commerce power and is unconstitutional. This economic mandate represents a wholly novel and potentially unbounded assertion of congressional authority: the ability to compel Americans to purchase an expensive health insurance product they have elected not to buy, and to make them re-purchase that insurance product every month for their entire lives. We have not found any generally applicable, judicially enforceable limiting principle that would permit us to uphold the mandate without obliterating the boundaries inherent in the system of enumerated congressional powers. “Uniqueness” is not a constitutional principle in any antecedent Supreme Court decision.

However, the panel, made up of two Democratic appointees and one GOP-appointed judge, did overturn lower court Judge Roger Vinson’s decision to invalidate the entire law, preferring to strike only the mandate and related provisions.

It will be interesting to see whether the Supreme Court agrees with this circuit court. Decisions on the matter have gone both ways in different courts.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: